Air flow distribution for a horizontal solar air heating collector with screen absorber

There has been some discussion on the Yahoo SimplySolar group about whether a horizontal collector with a screen absorber would show a bad airflow distribution due to the tendency of the warmed air to rise as it proceeds across the collector from inlet to outlet.

I decided to try a 4 by 8 collector that is usually used in the vertical position in the horizontal position and see if IR pictures of the glazing would show any problems with the underlying airflow pattern.

This is a 4 by 8 ft solar air heating collector.  The absorber is 3 layers of black aluminum window screen.  The glazing is twinwall polycarbonate.   

I took IR pictures of the glazing as air was being flowed through the collector with a blower.  The idea is that the IR camera sees the temperature of the surface of the glazing, but the glazing (to some degree) reflects the temperature of the air behind the glazing. 



The collector set up horizontally.
The inlet is to the right -- there is a full width baffle made from twinwall over the 6 inch circular duct lnlet to keep inlet air from blowing directly against the glazing.  The black metal baffle half way up is intended to deflect some of the air outward to the top and bottom so that (ideally) there is uniform flow over the full width of the collector.

The outlet is on the left -- its the 6 inch duct going out the back that can be seen in the picture.

The screen absorber is 3 layers of black alum screen with a space of about 3/8 ths inch between each layer.

The screen is arranged such that the air enters on the glazing side of the screen and has to flow through the screen to get out the exit, which is behind the screen.

The test was done outside, so the inlet air was on the cool side.

The IR pics were taken with a FLIR I7 -- the temperature ranges were adjusted for all pictures to show the range 40F up to 90F.

Horizontal Collector -- High Flow rate

In this first run, the air enters the inlet on the right at a relatively high flow rate, and exits on the left.

Tinlet = 51F

Toutlet = 76F

Flow rate = 980 fpm for 6 inch duct -- about 173 cfm with 90% velocity profile correction, or about 5.4 cfm/sf

Remember that what you are looking at in all of the pictures is the outer surface temperature of the glazing -- not the actual temperature of the air flowing through the collector.

So, I'd say this shows little effect of the collector being horizontal.  There is a slightly warmer spot up in the upper left above the exit vent, but its pretty small, and not that much hotter.


Horizontal Collector -- Normal Flow Rate

This run was done with a lower (more normal) airflow rate.

Tinlet = 47F

Toutlet = 87F

Flow rate = 550 fpm for 6 inch duct -- about 97 cfm with 90% velocity profile correction, or about 3.0 cfm/sf

This shows higher temperatures on the glazing all over as you would expect with the lower flow resulting in higher air temps through the collector.

The upper left corner hot spot appears somewhat larger, and there is more temperature difference between this hot corner and the lower down area.

How serious a performance hit this upper warmer area is hard (for me) to say.  When the earlier version of the screen collector was run vertically, it had spots in the upper left and right corners that ran hotter than the exit area -- so, this is not strictly a function of the horizontal orientation. 

The performance penalty compared to a collector with perfectly even flow is basically that the hotter glazing up in the upper left corner loses more heat out the glazing to the air.  As a rough estimate, if you said the hot spot corner is 12F hotter than it would be with perfect flow (based on the temps in the picture above), and the area of the hot spot is 6 sf, then the extra heat loss through the R2 glazing is:  (6 sf)(12F)/R2 = 36 BTU/hr   -- this is quite small compared to the nearly 4000 BTU/hr that the collector might harvest in full sun.

Its probably important to bear in mind that no collector achieves a perfectly even airflow distribution, and some are certainly much worse than this horizontal one judging from the IR pics of the glazing.

It may well be possible to work out some baffling that provides better circulation to the upper left corner -- any ideas?

This collector is only 8 ft wide, so the effect may get larger (or not?) as the width goes up.

I do plan to build a 2nd identical collector to this one, and at that point I will probably run the two side by side with one vertical and one horizontal.



If you have any thoughts or comments, please lets hear them.   





December 18, 2011